Where I Post Crunchy News, Argue Politics, Advocate Attachment Parenting And Natural Family Living, Channel Maria Montessori, Garden Organically, And Kick Your Lily White Arse For Making Your Baby Cry-It-Out
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Thursday, January 29, 2009
A Letter to My Senators About Obama's Stimulus Package
Money in the hands of mothers like me directly benefits the economy and the spirit of capitalism. Through me, bills get paid, food and clothing are bought, stores that sell baby and children products are frequented, and everyone benefits.
When the government puts money into the hands of businesses instead of individuals, the businesses thrive but the people do not. Money in the hands of individuals benefits people AND businesses. That's just common sense!
Job creation that includes repairing the infrastucture of our towns and cities, tax cuts, expanded unemployment benefits, improvement of the technology available to students, investment in the arts - these are things that you should be excited about supporting.
Supporting businesses at the expense of individuals has done nothing to help the economy. Forget the "socialism is evil" arguement. Most of us out here aren't hoping for handouts because we don't want to take responsibilty for ourselves. We're begging for help because the greed and ineptitude of America's businesses have left a lot of us unable to take responsibility for ourselves.
Rising health care, unemployment, impossibly expensive college education, low wages and disappearing benefits - these things impede the progress of even the most hard working people.
Rewarding the idiocy of largely unregulated businesses has not helped the economy. We are still in a downward spiral.
It's time to support moms like me and let the businesses wonder if they're going to be able to pay their heating bill next month.
- Alisa Terry
Orem, Utah
Monday, January 26, 2009
Children or Children's Books May Be Banned From Libraries
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The American Library Association (ALA) today expressed dissatisfaction with a public meeting held by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to discuss the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) and whether the law, which requires children’s products to undergo stringent testing for lead, should apply to ordinary, paper-based children’s books.
Under the current opinion issued by the General Counsel of the CPSC, the law would apply to books for children under the age of 12; therefore, public, school, academic and museum libraries would be required to either remove all their children’s books or ban all children under 12 from visiting the facilities as of February 10.
During the meeting, members of a panel including representatives of the American Association of Publishers (AAP) as well as major book publishers and ink manufacturers, addressed questions raised by the CPSC rulemaking committee regarding the testing procedures and methodologies currently exercised in the production of an ordinary book.
The panel presented a collection of data reinforcing their position that ordinary books pose no inherent threat. This information can be viewed here. Though the CPSC acknowledged that the current deadlines are unrealistic and potentially damaging, the General Counsel gave no clear indication as to when an official ruling would be made and could offer no definite direction to libraries at this point.
“It is completely irresponsible and unacceptable for the CPSC to continue to leave this matter unresolved with the February 10th deadline drawing closer each day,” ALA President Jim Rettig said.
“It is apparent that the CPSC does not fully understand the ramifications this law will have for libraries – and for children – if libraries are not granted an exemption. At this point, we are advising libraries not to take drastic action, such as removing or destroying books, as we continue to hope this matter will be rectified and that the attention will be paid to the products that pose a true threat to children. However, we find it disappointing and shameful that a government agency would continue to leave this matter unsettled when clearly the outcome would virtually shut down our nation’s school and public libraries.”
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Dr Phil Does a Segment on The Facebook Breastfeeding Controversy
The key here, though, is the woman who says it's OK to nurse in public but weird to put a picture of it up on the internet. Huh?
Scheich Animals - Some of the Greatest Toys of All Time
Very early on, Connor learned their names, including the more obscure animals such as the Okapi and Ibex. He sorts them into family groups, similar colors or species, and story collections - for example, when he watches Tarzan, he brings out all the animals found in Tarzan. When he reads his zoo book, he brings out all the animals found in the zoo.
Friday, January 23, 2009
Blatant Misuse of the Montessori Brown Stairs
Connor still mixes up some of the stairs, and the way I get him interested in this activity is to include his favorite toys in the whole wide world. Once he set them up the way he wanted, we talked about our latest focus - "in front of." He has a difficult time understanding prepositional phrases, so we're going to add those to our activities.
Deirdre wouldn't leave him alone, so she's watching Bunny Town on the iPod.
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Passes Senate and House!
Inevitable Environmental Disaster?
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.500-one-last-chance-to-save-mankind.html?full=true&print=true
"With his 90th birthday in July, a trip into space scheduled for later in the year and a new book out next month, 2009 promises to be an exciting time for James Lovelock. But the originator of the Gaia theory, which describes Earth as a self-regulating planet, has a stark view of the future of humanity. He tells Gaia Vince we have one last chance to save ourselves - and it has nothing to do with nuclear power."
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Vote For The Worst Toy Of The Year!
I'm a hypocrite when it comes to the commercialization of children, but part of that is because in my family it's been an uphill battle and I've decided to give up. So, Connor and Deirdre have many things that are branded and purchased primarily because they have Winnie the Pooh or Lightening McQueen on them.
And, as some of you recall from the family drama now erased from this particular blog, asking people to forgo certain categories of gifts is apparently faux pas.
So, my kids are surrounded by things I would prefer they not have (and no Bryan doesn't share my view on this, so I speak only for myself here). And as time has gone on, I've pretty much embraced it. If Disney can get my kid to take his vitamins just because he's eating his favorite characters, I'll take it. And for Pete's Sake, who doesn't love Tigger? Can't....resist...the pull.....of adorable bouncy stuffed tiger....
Nevertheless, in my heart I support the principle of less television and less commercialization, and appreciate the efforts of Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. The toys they have up for Worst Toy of The Year are truly heinous and it was hard to decide which one was more wrong than the others.
Incidentally, I chose the Fisher-Price Smart Cycle.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Let Sleeping Babies Lie - The Mystery Continues
Observe:
"
Myth 7: Never wake a sleeping baby.
Fact: While most babies will indicate when they need to eat, babies in the newborn period may not wake often enough on their own and should be awakened if necessary to eat at least eight times a day. Infrequent waking to feed can be caused by labor drugs, maternal medications, jaundice, trauma, pacifiers and/or shutdown behavior after delayed response to feeding cues.
In addition, mothers who wish to take advantage of the natural infertility of lactational amenorrhea find that the return of menses is delayed longer when baby continues to suckle at night.
American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement on Breastfeeding and the use of Human Milk. Pediatrics 1997; 100(6):1035-39.
Klaus, M. The frequency of suckling: neglected but essential ingredient of breast-feeding. Ob Gyn Clin North Am 1987; 14(3):623-33.
Mohrbacher, N., Stock, J. BREASTFEEDING ANSWER BOOK. Schaumburg, Illinois: LLLI, 1997; 60-65, 360-61.
Tips for Rousing a Sleepy Newborn. LLLI, 1997. Publication No.485."
I love how LLL is referencing its own publications. Brilliant!
I did find this publication by the International Lactation Consultant Association that cites, on page ten, lots of research backing the idea that a baby should be fed at least 8 times in a 24 hour period, but it never goes so far as to say a baby can't sleep a long stretch and then make up for that feeding while awake. In fact, it doesn't mention waking up a baby at all.
Despite the many respectable organizations perpetuating this advice, I see no basis for it. if a baby is gaining weight and doesn't show signs of dehydration (infrequent wet diapers or dark colored urine), leave your poor sleeping baby alone. I've been exhausted and have a poor memory for the last three years due to frequently interrupted sleep. I just cannot fathom why it should be a hard rule to interrupt something as crucial as sleep.
And I don't like professionals spreading blanket advice without good reason. It seems to me they've gone beyond the mark with this research. Breastfeed your baby on cue unless there is a health problem. Period.
And skip the babyscheduling. I have never seen a single study that shows benefits to baby scheduling, be it to breastfeed less frequently or breastfeed more frequently.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Should You Wake Up Your Newborn to Breastfeed?
We are having a surprising discussion in my Natural Mamas Playgroup forum. A mama’s new baby has a fever and wants to sleep for long stretches of time. She wants to know if she should wake her baby up every four hours to make sure she nurses. I said no, but so far I’ve been outvoted.
My OPINION of the matter is that it is just baby scheduling from a different angle. Connor nursed every two to three hours until he was four months old. Deirdre was sleeping six to eight hours straight each night by the time she was two weeks old, and then nursing for almost a whole hour when she woke up.
I assumed, and still do, that breastfeeding on demand, or following the baby’s cue, meant actually that – letting the baby be the Buddha: Eat when hungry, Sleep when tired. If there had been slowed weight gain or a significant drop in wet diapers, I would have considered pushing Deirdre to eat more often, but in general I would think trusting the baby means TRUSTING the baby.
But is there actual research or evidence to the contrary? One of my friends referred me to two of the best breastfeeding websites online: La Leche League and Kelly Mom.
This is what I found:
“2. The baby sleeps through the night. Not necessarily. A baby who is sleeping through the night at 10 days of age, for example, may, in fact, not be getting enough milk. A baby who is too sleepy and has to be awakened for feeds or who is "too good" may not be getting enough milk. There are many exceptions, but get help quickly.” Handout #4. Is My Baby Getting Enough Milk? Revised January 2005Written by Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC. © 2005
“Waking for Night Feedings
Many pediatricians recommend that parents shouldn't let a newborn sleep longer than three or four hours without feeding, and the vast majority of babies wake far more frequently than that. (There are a few exceptional babies who can go longer.) No matter what, your baby will wake up during the night. The key is to learn when you should pick her up for a night feeding and when you can let her go back to sleep on her own.
This is a time when you need to focus your instincts and intuition. This is when you should try very hard to learn how to read your baby's signals. Here's a tip that is critically important for you to know. Babies make many sleeping sounds, from grunts to whimpers to outright cries, and these noises don't always signal awakening. These are what I call sleeping noises, and your baby is nearly or even totally asleep during these episodes. I remember when my first baby, Angela, was a newborn. Her cry awakened me many times, yet she was asleep in my arms before I even made it from cradle to rocking chair. She was making sleeping noises. In my desire to respond to my baby's every cry, I actually taught her to wake up more often!
You need to listen and watch your baby carefully. Learn to differentiate between these sleeping sounds and awake and hungry sounds. If she is awake and hungry, you'll want to feed her as quickly as possible. If you respond immediately when she is hungry, she will most likely go back to sleep quickly. But, if you let her cry escalate, she will wake herself up totally, and it will be harder and take longer for her to go back to sleep. Not to mention that you will then be wide awake, too!” - The No-Cry Sleep Solution:Gentle Ways to Help Your Baby Sleep Through the Night by Elizabeth PantleyMcGraw-Hill/Contemporary BooksISBN: 0071381392
“"My baby just started sleeping longer at night. Do I need to wake him to nurse?"
If your baby is younger than 4 weeks, then it is a good idea to wake baby at least every 4-5 hours at night to nurse if he does not wake on his own. If your child is older than 4 weeks, you can allow baby to sleep as long as he wants at night as long as he is peeing, pooping, and gaining weight within normal parameters. “ - Hunger Cues - When do I feed baby?
By Kelly Bonyata, BS, IBCLC
“How often should baby be nursing?
Frequent nursing encourages good milk supply and reduces engorgement. Aim for nursing at least 10 - 12 times per day (24 hours). You CAN'T nurse too often--you CAN nurse too little.
Nurse at the first signs of hunger (stirring, rooting, hands in mouth)--don't wait until baby is crying. Allow baby unlimited time at the breast when sucking actively, then offer the second breast. Some newborns are excessively sleepy at first--wake baby to nurse if 2 hours (during the day) or 4 hours (at night) have passed without nursing. “Nursing your newborn — what to expect in the early weeks
This information is also found as part of the professional Breastfeeding Logs.
By Kelly Bonyata, BS, IBCLC
How often should I nurse my baby?
Every baby is different! Due to individual differences, healthy full-term babies may breastfeed as often as every hour or as infrequently as every four hours and thrive, according to LLLI BREASTFEEDING ANSWER BOOK (BAB) Third Revised Edition, page 26. Daily breastfeeding patterns will vary from baby to baby and from day to day.
Many mothers are surprised at how quickly and easily human milk is digested (often within 90 minutes of the last feeding). Rather than watching the clock it is recommended that a mother watch for signs that her newborn is hungry, such as the rooting reflex, chewing/sucking on hands or fingers, or crying.
Mothers can follow their baby's lead in how often to breastfeed, as long as their baby is getting enough. See the FAQ on how to tell your baby is getting enough milk or the articles in our Web resource page on milk supply issues. Breastfed babies regulate themselves; they take what they need at each feeding, and from each breast. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that healthy, full-term newborns should breastfeed eight to twelve times in each 24-hour period. This equates to feedings two to three hours apart.
Thus, if your baby is not breastfeeding at least eight to twelve times in a 24-hour period in the early weeks, you may need to wake your baby to breastfeed more often. You can find an information sheet on "Tips for Rousing the Sleepy Newborn" in the LLLI Online Store, or it may be available from your local Leader. It is important that you rouse your baby for feeding as necessary so your baby will gain properly.
- La Leche League
So, it seems to me that if your baby is gaining weight and has frequent wet diapers during the day, it is perfectly fine for baby to sleep for long periods of time without being woken up. Once again, the right answer is, “Follow your baby.”
Thursday, January 15, 2009
This feels Just Absolutely Right
Hollywood film star Will Smith has staked his claim to play Barack Obama in a movie about his rise to become US President and America’s first black leader.
By Tim Walker, MandrakeLast Updated: 3:28PM GMT 15 Jan 2009
Smith has staked his claim to play the role, even before Barack Obama has been inaugurated as president.
Speaking at the premiere of his new film Seven Pounds at the Empire, Leicester Square, in London, Smith laughed about reports that the US President-elect had indicated that he would like the actor to play him if his life story were ever to be made into a movie.
“If I am ordered by my commander in chief to star in a film about him, I will do my duty as an American," he said, beaming.
Smith, best known for the Men in Black films and Independence Day, says however that he had no desire to move into the White House for real.
"If we were in the White House I don't know if that would exactly be a good thing. The Obamas are much more prepared to be in the White House than the Smiths.
"It's a whole lot more fun to be a movie star. That's a difficult job being President with a whole lot of lives on the line with every decision you make. In my job I just bring joy. I don't bring bad news. I think I'll stay in my position for quite some time." Smith said the “world had changed forever” with the election of Barack Obama.
He said he would be an "eyewitness to history" when he attends the impending inauguration of US President-elect Barack Obama.
Seven Pounds charts Smith's character Ben Thomas's attempts at redemption following a horrific accident. It also stars Rosario Dawson.
The actor added that he also has plans to do a Bollywood film with Danny Boyle following the success of Slumdog Millionaire.
He said: "I talked to Danny Boyle just a couple of weeks ago. When we find something it will be fantastic. I'm trying to expand as an actor and as an artist to bring stories to the screen that add to people's lives that work in service to humanity."
Monday, January 12, 2009
Breastfeeding is to Porn as Dr Pepper is to Beer
One poster made an analogy I have heard many times - that of breastfeeding uncovered in public being comparable to putting a bottle of beer in front of an alcoholic.
Heather's response was brilliant:
The problem with comparing a mother nursing in front of someone struggling with porn to placing alcohol in front of an alcoholic is that breastfeeding isn't porn. If you want to go with that analogy, then I'd say it would be more like putting a Dr. Pepper in front of an alcoholic. Dr. Pepper is like alcohol in the fact that it's a drink and it's fizzy, like beer. Breastfeeding might be like porn in the fact that it involves a person and possibly some nudity. But not all alcohol is fizzy and not all soft drinks are alcoholic. In the same way, not all pornography is nudity and not all nudity is pornographic. Breastfeeding is not pornographic for the reasons I've stated in the post.
Might I add she has much more patience with the temper tantrums of that poster than I do.
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Why Does An Organic Seed Matter?
There are some organic seed companies with ties to Monsanto. Here is my previous post on companies that are not connected to Monsanto.
Here is some detailed information on terminator seeds, copied from http://www.banterminator.org/The-Issues/Introduction (A canadian organization)
"The top 10 largest seed companies control half the world’s commercial seed market. If Terminator is commercialized, corporations will likely incorporate sterility genes into all their seeds. That’s because genetic seed sterilization would secure a much stronger monopoly than patents — instead of suing farmers for saving seed, companies are trying to make it biologically impossible for farmers to re-use harvested seed.
Canadian farms of all sizes save seeds and this practice is growing as the farm income crisis gets worse each year. Across the world, over 1.4 billion people, primarily small-scale farming families in the developing world, depend on farm-saved seed as their primary seed source. Terminator seeds will force dependence on external seed sources and disrupt the age-old practice of farmer seed selection, exchange and breeding - centuries of Indigenous and farmer seed variety development is the foundation of the Canadian seed stock.
Terminator is a major violation of the rights of farmers to save and reuse their own seeds. Through pollen movement in the first generation, Terminator genes could contaminate farmers’ crops - farmers might then unknowingly save and reuse seeds that are contaminated and will not germinate. This could also happen if imported grain contains Terminator genes.
Farmers who depend on humanitarian food aid risk devastating crop loss if they unknowingly use food aid grain containing Terminator genes as seed.
Terminator would ensure a corporate stranglehold on seeds and result in higher seed prices at a time when farmers are experiencing the worst income crisis in the history of modern agriculture. If Canadian farmers were forced to buy Terminator seeds every year, the cost would be crippling. For example, an estimated 90% of Canadian wheat is planted with saved seed – in total, the annual cost to buy this seed would be $95 million dollars. "
This is why, if you can, it is important to support more ethical seed companies.
For TONS of evidence of other Monsanto atrocities, click here.
I Ordered Seeds!! (Insert Giddy Dancing) - Updated
I ordered:
black eyed peas
broccoli
bok choy
popcorn
cucumber
eggplant
three different lettuces
onion
bell pepper
spinache
zucchini
red slicing tomato
redpaste tomato
and four of the six herbs I need to mix my own herbes de provence. I already have the rosemary and for some reason BG doesn't carry marjoram so I need to find that somewhere. I want toplant all my herbs in pots so I can take them with me when we move.
I still need potatoes and strawberries.
I ordered all early varieties because hopefully we'll be moving in the summer for grad school. I intend to start most of these indoors. The onion variety I bought takes only about two months and stores very well. The potatoes I have my eyes on are similar.
There is a circle of dirt around a young plum tree in the front yard and I intend to fill the entire thing with strawberry plants.
The entire back half of the backyard is weeds. I am going to plant of it with popcorn, 1/3 with black-eyed peas, and the third set up against the garage I am going to turn into a giant sunflower forest with a circle in the middle where we can go hide.
There's a section that stays shaded pretty much all day that I'm not sure what to do with yet.
I told my landlord tonight that my goal is to make the rest of the front and back yards so awesome that he can't possibly be mad over the lawn, and he said it was a deal. Now I'm making that public, just in case he forgets this summer and the lawn looks like hell. (And you all know I've tried VERY hard to make that lawn obey my every command).
I bought my first pressure cookerso that I can make awesome bean dishes this year.
Incidentally, I do make a delicious black-eyed pea stew, but black-eyed peas don't need to be presoaked like beans, and only take about 30-45 minutes to make delicious.
I had the most success with green peppers, broccoli, pumpkin, and squash last year. Let's see if I can do it again this year!
Thursday, January 08, 2009
Food for Thought
A British Tory will defend self-determination in Europe and oppose it in India with no feeling of inconsistency. Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage -- torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians -- which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by 'our' side ...
The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.
- Orwell
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Early C-Sections Bad
NEW YORK – Babies do better after a scheduled Caesarean section if they're born no sooner than seven days before their due date, a new large study of U.S. births shows. Those delivered earlier had more complications, including breathing problems, even though they were full term, the researchers reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. Even just a few days made a difference, they said.
The findings offer important guidance to the growing number of women who face planned C-sections. And the study supports recommendations that elective C-sections be scheduled after 39 weeks unless tests show the infant's lungs are fully mature. Due dates are set at 40 weeks gestation and infants are full term at 37 weeks.
"Take your due date and subtract seven and any one of those seven days is fine," said one of the researchers, Dr. John Thorp, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine.
He delivered a healthy baby girl on Tuesday after persuading her mother to wait a few more days for a C-section, even though last week would have been more convenient for both mother and doctor.
"We bit the bullet and did it at the right time," said Thorp.
The rate of Caesarean sections in the United States is at an all-time high, accounting for about 31 percent of births. There are lots of reasons: older moms, multiple births, the threat of malpractice lawsuits, the preference of mothers and doctors and the risks of having a vaginal birth after a previous Caesarean. In 2006, a government panel urged women not to seek a C-section without a medical reason; surgery brings risks and babies born by Caesarean have a greater chance for respiratory problems.
In the new study, the researchers, led by Dr. Alan Tita of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, examined a C-section registry from 19 academic medical centers to see how many of the surgeries were being done before the recommended 39 weeks and if the timing made a difference in the risk of complications.
They focused on 13,258 women who had a single child at a planned Caesarean and who had previously given birth the same way. Excluded were cases where medical issues warranted an early or immediate delivery. The infants were followed until they left the hospital or for four months.
More than a third of the C-sections were performed before 39 weeks, the researchers found. Those delivered at 37 weeks were twice as likely to have health problems, including breathing troubles, infections, low blood sugar or the need for intensive care. Fifteen percent of those born at 37 weeks and 11 percent born at 38 weeks had complications, compared to 8 percent of the babies delivered at 39 weeks. The only death was an infant born at 39 weeks.
The biggest difference was in breathing problems, with a fourfold increase for those born at 37 weeks compared to 39 weeks. Babies born by C-section already have a higher risk of breathing trouble than those born vaginally; labor helps clear the lungs of fluid.
The risk of complications also increased for births after 41 weeks, but there were few births in that category, the researchers said.
Tita said the researchers didn't know the reasons behind the chosen delivery dates. They speculated that some mothers might want to deliver as soon as the fetus reaches full term, or an earlier time may have been more convenient for the mother or doctor.
Dr. Michael Greene, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, noted the research showed that there's even an increased risk of complications in the last few days before the 39th week. That's something most doctors wouldn't suspect, he said.
"I generally try to wait to 39 weeks, although I confess that I'm as guilty as anybody else with a busy practice and scheduling being what it is," said Greene, who wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal. "I really hadn't thought much about it until now."
The study only looked at live births, and didn't account for the small risk of the fetus dying while waiting to reach 39 weeks, Greene said. That risk has been estimated up to 1 in 1,000, he said.
Thorp's patient in Chapel Hill, Shannon Eubanks, said she was glad that she held off a few days to reach the 39-week threshold before having her daughter, Kathleen Conley Eubanks. Her first child, 2-year-old Charlie, was born by C-section.
"It was hard to wait," said Eubanks, business manager of the political science department at the university. "I was very over being pregnant and ready to get the show on the road."
And she had another reason for wanting to deliver last week.
As an accountant, "It just killed me not to have this kid in 2008" to get the tax deduction, Eubanks said hours after delivering.
Apparently, I Use Lots of Big Words
Monday, January 05, 2009
My Friend's Beans and Rice Blog
I'm very excited about this! I'm the first follower, too. Come on over and let's become bean masters!




